Critical Analysis of Leadership Essay Sample. There are many definitions of leadership. Joseph Rost defined leadership as an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes.
Followers and Leaders of Animal Farm Animals on Manor Farm over throw their mean and evil rulers who have overworked and mistreated them.Once the animals get control over the farm they set up slogans and rules the animals must follow in order to have equality and justice on the new farm.
Followers see the talents and accomplishments of other people as a threat. Leaders see those same talents and accomplishments as an asset. Leaders want to make things better, and they’ll take help anywhere they can find it. Leaders are team players. They aren’t afraid to admit that they need other people to be strong where they’re weak.
The Dynamics of the Leader Follower Relationship 2010. ABSTRACT This study examined the forces that affect the influence relationship between leaders and followers in a public sector organisational setting. The study is motivated by the ambition of presenting a critical perspective of the social influence process referred to as leadership.
Autocratic leadership style: It is very significant style of leadership in which a leader takes all the decision on the basis of his gut feeling and whatever he is thinking towards the situation.The role of employees and followers is completely negligible in taking the decisions. Before assessing the impact of this style there is a huge requirement of creating certain situations.
Great followers not only accept this fact, they embrace; it. They are obedient. While obedience may be a politically incorrect concept, it is essential for organizational effectiveness. No one should be allowed to give orders who can’t obey orders. This is how great leaders model the standards of acceptable behavior to their own followers.
Good leaders can enable and empower people to deliver of their best, in a way that benefits both the organisation and all the individuals involved. Yet we rarely examine this key link between leaders and followers to see how it works best, who needs to do what or what is expected of the people involved.
Good followers will assist their leaders in achieving goals. Bad followers can actively sabotage the achievement of goals (Moran, 2014). Good followers also learn to think for themselves and will stand up to a leader who may be heading in the wrong direction (Moran, 2014). Being a good follower does not end when one becomes a leader.